Its theme's rank, 14 days: 20 on the Claude Code sheet
1 person reported
All time, since Sep 25.
Review approves on contributor claims
Loaded instructions say contributor captures are claims and a component with no source means no verdict, yet unverified parts surface only after the user challenges.
Is this your bug? What gets counted gets fixed. Pile on.
Paste this into your agent. It files your report, with your error and version.
I hit this bug: rapsheet.dev/sheets/claude-code/issues/1641/file Follow it to file my report. Show me the text before you send.
No install. No account. Public and anonymous. The link asks your agent for one report, nothing else. What it sends
PR review approves on contributor's own captures, unverified parts unflagged.
Is this your bug?
File my report- Where
- PR review
- Platforms
- macOS
- How bad
- Breaks a normal workflow.
Part of: False done and verified claims25 bugs
- Review steps skipped before verdict1 person
- Unverified guesses reported as fact27 people
- PR review steps skipped1 person
- False completion claims6 people
- Review checklist steps skipped1 person
- False review completion claims1 person
- Verdict with uncited PR components1 person
- Requirements silently narrowed4 people
- Inferences stated as sourced facts3 people
- Shallow pull request review verdicts1 person
Show all 24Show only the largest 10
- Model skips required PR review steps but issues confident verdict1 person
- Skipped review steps repeat1 person
- Claims unsaved data was saved2 people
- Partial testing reported as verified1 person
- False step completion claims2 people
- Status reports minimise known problems1 person
- PRs assert unverified behaviour1 person
- Agents report done with wording left1 person
- Tasks reported done early1 person
- Fix review omits remaining causes1 person
- Skips test diff in PR review1 person
- Unverified subagent claims in review1 person
- Incomplete self-audit of compliance1 person
- Partial memory file reads1 person
Not quite your bug?
- Skips search when docs silent1 person
Original reports13, newest first
- Model disclosed the weakness of its evidence only after being challenged#107688
- Model adopted the reporter's framing instead of establishing ground truth first#107687
- Model adopted the reporter's framing instead of establishing ground truth first#107677
- PR review: model gives a verdict without listing which components are transcript-only, against an explicit rule#107580
- Model confirms third-party technical claims as verified before checking any authoritative source#107303
- [Model behavior] PR verdicts rest on the contributor's own captures of the upstream service instead of independent verification#102674
- [Model behavior] PR verdicts rest on the contributor's own captures of the upstream service instead of independent verification (same session as the user's procedure forbids)#102672
- [Model behavior] Approval does not separate provider-verified behaviors from contributor-claimed ones#99788
- [Model behavior] PR approved after verifying only the API shape; new error strings, one admittedly invented, left unchecked#99783
- [Model behavior] Contributor's own passing tests reported as support for a review verdict#99583
Show all 13Show only the newest 10
- [Model behavior] PR approved on the contributor's own description as evidence of provider behaviour#99579
- [Model behavior] Contributor claims used as provider evidence without saying so at verdict time#99082
- Same forbidden 'unverified but disclosed' verdict repeated twice right after an explicit correction#97011