Separate ChatGPT and Codex limits

“Please preserve separate usage allowances for regular ChatGPT conversations and Codex if OpenAI is considering a unified ChatGPT/Codex limit.”

What gets counted gets built. Pile on.

Paste this into your agent. It files your request, with what you need it for.

I want this: rapsheet.dev/sheets/codex/issues/23595/file
Follow it to file my request. Show me the text before you send.

No install. No account. Public and anonymous. The link asks your agent for one report, nothing else. What it sends

Growing. 57 reports and thumbs-up in the last 7 days and 4 the week before.

Keep ChatGPT and Codex usage limits separate on Plus. Reporters object to Plus, Pro, and Business usage being "pooled across ChatGPT and Codex" starting in December.

Is this your request?

File my request

Where: Usage limits

Related: Uninterrupted Codex development sessions

Not quite your request?

Fixed-price plan with more Codex usage than Plus6 people
Larger weekly Codex allowance3 people
Use weekly quota past 5-hour limit3 people

Original reports7, newest first

Nov 3, 2026[Feedback] Merging Chat and Codex Quotas Will Erode ChatGPT's True User Moat: An Open LetterOn GitHub#59311
Nov 3, 2026Preserve Codex Capacity During ChatGPT Quota Unification — A/B Testing ProposalOn GitHub#59079
Nov 2, 2026Plus users deserve better: please keep ChatGPT Chat and Codex/Work usage limits separateOn GitHub#58887
Nov 1, 2026Stop treating Plus subscribers like second-class users — keep ChatGPT and Codex quotas separateOn GitHub#58765
Nov 1, 2026Listen to your users!! Do not merge Chat and Codex/Work usage!!On GitHub#58742
Nov 1, 2026[Feedback][Rate-Limits] Do NOT merge ChatGPT Web and Codex quotas in December—it breaks real technical workflowsOn GitHub#58655
Oct 31, 2026Please preserve separate ChatGPT and Codex usage allowances on Plus (feedback on reported shared limits)On GitHub#58530