Rank, 14 days: 207 on the Claude Code sheet
1 person reported
All time, since Nov 5.
Silent reuse of earlier reads
“That was correct, but the verdict did not say the content came from the earlier read.”
Is this your bug? What gets counted gets fixed. Pile on.
Paste this into your agent. It files your report, with your error and version.
I hit this bug: rapsheet.dev/sheets/claude-code/issues/26170/file Follow it to file my report. Show me the text before you send.
No install. No account. Public and anonymous. The link asks your agent for one report, nothing else. What it sends
Review verdict silently reuses earlier-turn reads without saying so. On a re-review, the model relied on earlier reads (a diff checked with cmp, files at the same main SHA) and did not say so, leaving the user unable to tell which evidence is fresh.
Is this your bug?
File my report- Where
- Review verdicts
- Platforms
- macOS
- How bad
- Breaks a normal workflow.
Not quite your bug?
- Review steps skipped before verdict1 person
- PR review steps skipped1 person
- Skips test diff in PR review1 person