2 people reported
All time, since Aug 21.
Parallel coverage under-reported
“Coverage from the workers should be merged.”
Is this your bug? What gets counted gets fixed. Pile on.
Paste this into your agent. It files your report, with your error and version.
I hit this bug: rapsheet.dev/sheets/bun/issues/5683/file Follow it to file my report. Show me the text before you send.
No install. No account. Public and anonymous. The link asks your agent for one report, nothing else. What it sends
Coverage under-reported when running tests with --parallel. Files covered fully in serial runs show lower line coverage under bun test --parallel, failing coverage thresholds with all tests passing.
Is this your bug?
File my report- Where
- bun test coverage
- Versions
- 1.3.14 to 1.4.2
- Platforms
- macOS
- How bad
- Breaks a normal workflow.
Not quite your bug?
Original reports4, newest first
- bun test coverage: isolated test files' counts are not merged, and plugin source maps are ignored in lcov#45301
- bun test --parallel: coverage merge under-reports vs. serial baseline, fails threshold with 0 test failures#40586
- bun test --coverage under --parallel undercounts LCOV for a plugin-loaded module shared across test files#40386
- bun test --coverage --parallel does not merge line coverage across workers#39930